Technical standards, such as interface protocols or file formats, are extremely important in the “network industries” that add so much value to the world economy today. Under some circumstances, the assertion of patent rights against established industry standards can seriously disrupt these network industries. We have in mind two particularly disruptive tactics: (1) the “snake in the grass,” whereby a patentee intentionally keeps a patent “quiet” while a standard is being designed or adopted, and then later, after the standard is entrenched, asserts the patent widely in an attempt to capitalize on its popularity; (2) the “bait and switch” ploy where a patentee encourages adoption by offering royalty-free use of standard-related patents, and then, after the standard has gone into widespread use, begins to enforce its patents against adopters of the standard.
An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards
|
VIEW PDF
Circuit: Archived Content
RECENT POSTS
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyMOST POPULAR
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyRight Problem; Wrong Solution
- Joseph L. Hoffmann and Nancy J. KingBY DATE
- August 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
BY CATEGORY
- california supreme court (1)
- chesney (1)
- cole (1)
- detention (1)
- elkins (1)
- family (1)
- Independence (1)
- Professionalism (1)
- Torture (1)
- Yoo (1)
- zelon (1)
NEWS & EVENTS
META
The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.