In recent years, wind energy production has expanded exponentially in the United States. With this staggering growth of wind power in areas both rural and urban, neighboring property-owners have become more vocal in their opposition to the construction of new wind turbines. This comment analyses the current body of case law on nuisance lawsuits against wind power developments, in light of the historical development of nuisance law. Starting with Roman law and tracing nuisance law through its present state in the United States, the comment formulates an argument as to how nuisance law should be applied to wind turbines. The comment then considers the cases that have considered this issue, assessing them in view of the original purposes underlying nuisance law. The comment also advances the point that one of the most fully-reasoned decisions on the issue, a West Virginia Supreme Court case from 2007, threatens to undermine the legal and policy underpinnings of nuisance law while impeding the future development of wind energy in the United States.
Headwinds to a Clean Energy Future: Nuisance Suits Against Wind Energy Projects in the United States
|
VIEW PDF
Circuit: Archived Content
RECENT POSTS
Book Review of The Laws of Spaceflight: A Guidebook for New Space Lawyers
- Glenn Harlan ReynoldsThe Twenty-First Century Fingerprint: Previewing Maryland v. King
- Keagan D. BuchananRace, Descent, and Tribal Citizenship
- Bethany R. BergerAmerican Indian Legal Scholarship and the Courts: Heeding Frickey’s Call
- Matthew L.M. FletcherBY DATE
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
BY CATEGORY
- 2011 Jorde Symposium (5)
- 2012 AALS Section on Law and Humanities Program (9)
- banquet (1)
- birth control (1)
- california supreme court (1)
- chesney (1)
- cole (1)
- constitutional democracy (1)
- consumer protection (1)
- Crime (1)
- Deportation (1)
- detention (1)
- dodd-frank (1)
- domestic violence (1)
- elkins (1)
- family (1)
- fourth amendment (1)
- Germany (1)
- Independence (1)
- information behavior (1)
- intersex (1)
- John Yoo (1)
- judicial restraint (6)
- law schools (1)
- partisanship (1)
- party politics (1)
- popular democracy (1)
- Privacy (2)
- Professionalism (1)
- Prosser (1)
- Prosser Symposium (1)
- Punishment (1)
- sterilization (1)
- Tort (1)
- Torture (1)
- war powers (1)
- Yoo (1)
- zelon (1)
NEWS & EVENTS
SYMPOSIA
META
The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.