How Should Lower Courts Interpret Plurality Decisions?: Exploring Options Through United States v. Duvall

19 Apr 2014 03:04pm Christopher Sung 

In this Casenote, the author examines the D.C. Circuit's decision in United States v. Duvall, a case that illustrates the difficulty the D.C. Circuit has had in interpreting the Supreme Court's plurality decision in Freeman v. United States. The author analyzes the Supreme Court's method for interpreting plurality decisions, the Marks rule, and potential alternatives to the rule. Ultimately, the author argues that Justice Sotomayor's concurring opinion should be the controlling opinion of Freeman.    

Note: This PDF's pagination was corrected on November 3, 2014. We regret any inconvenience.

  |   VIEW PDF

META


The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.