This article investigates the relationship between ideology and judicial decision-making in the context of intellectual property. Using data drawn from Supreme Court intellectual property cases decided in between 1954 and 2006, the authors show that ideology is a significant determinant of cases involving intellectual property rights: the more conservative a judge is, the more likely he or she is to vote in favor of an intellectual property claim. However, their analysis also shows that there are significant differences between intellectual property and other areas of the law with respect to the effect of ideology. This analysis has important implications for the study of intellectual property. It also contributes to the broader judicial ideology literature by demonstrating the effect of ideology in economic cases.
Circuit: Archived Content
RECENT POSTS
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyMOST POPULAR
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyRight Problem; Wrong Solution
- Joseph L. Hoffmann and Nancy J. KingBY DATE
- August 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
BY CATEGORY
- california supreme court (1)
- chesney (1)
- cole (1)
- detention (1)
- elkins (1)
- family (1)
- Independence (1)
- Professionalism (1)
- Torture (1)
- Yoo (1)
- zelon (1)
NEWS & EVENTS
META
The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.