The California Supreme Court has replaced the New York Court of Appeals, the federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court as the court at the cutting edge of many issues in American public law. The process of displacement probably began long ago, perhaps as early as 1948, when the California Supreme Court’s decision in Perez v. Sharp became the first appellate decision to recognize that state bars to interracial marriage are unconstitutional. That landmark decision has been followed by a steady stream of others. The latest such decision is In re Marriage Cases, in which a closely divided (4-3) court held that the State’s exclusion of same-sex couples from civil marriage violated the state constitution’s equal protection guarantee.
The Marriage Cases—Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy
|
VIEW PDF
Circuit: Archived Content
RECENT POSTS
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyMOST POPULAR
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyRight Problem; Wrong Solution
- Joseph L. Hoffmann and Nancy J. KingBY DATE
- August 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
BY CATEGORY
- california supreme court (1)
- chesney (1)
- cole (1)
- detention (1)
- elkins (1)
- family (1)
- Independence (1)
- Professionalism (1)
- Torture (1)
- Yoo (1)
- zelon (1)
NEWS & EVENTS
META
The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.