The Rise and Fall of the Implied Warranty of Habitability

13 Jun 2011 10:11pm David A. Super 

Growing concern about poverty in the late 1960s produced two sweeping legal revolutions. One gave welfare recipients specific legal rights against arbitrary eligibility rules and benefit terminations. The other gave low-income tenants recourse when landlords failed to repair their homes. The 1996 welfare law exposed the welfare rights revolution’s frailty by ending Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and severely cutting other key programs. Little noticed by legal scholars, the tenants’ rights revolution’s centerpiece, the implied warranty of habitability, also has failed, and for broadly similar reasons.

  |   VIEW PDF


The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.