Self-Represented Litigants in Family Law: The Response of California’s Courts
There is “a unity of interest between the courts and the public with respect to assistance for self-represented litigants. Lack of legal assistance is clearly an enormous barrier for the public." In response to this critical situation, the Task Force has developed a comprehensive statewide plan which recommends a full menu of approaches to meeting the needs of the public and the courts.
Remarks of Jeff Bleich at the First Annual Conference on the California Supreme Court
I believe there are two areas where reform would improve the quality of advocacy by the California Supreme Court Bar. First, California would benefit from developing a team of advocates within its Solicitor General's office to routinely represent the State before the California Supreme Court. Second, California law schools should consider developing a clinic dedicated to helping identify good cases for state supreme court review and ensuring those cases are well presented.
RECENT POSTS
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyMOST POPULAR
The Preventive Dilemma: A Reply to David Cole
- Robert ChesneyRight Problem; Wrong Solution
- Joseph L. Hoffmann and Nancy J. KingBY DATE
- August 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
BY CATEGORY
- california supreme court (1)
- chesney (1)
- cole (1)
- detention (1)
- elkins (1)
- family (1)
- Independence (1)
- Professionalism (1)
- Torture (1)
- Yoo (1)
- zelon (1)
NEWS & EVENTS
META
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.