THE CIRCUIT
CURRENT CONTENT

Inside Out

23 Dec 2011 09:13am Elizabeth F. Emens 

Standing to Sue in the Myriad Genetics Case

23 Nov 2011 09:07am Megan M. La Belle 

Fundamental Fairness and the Path from Santobello to Padilla: A Response to Professor Bibas

03 Oct 2011 10:33am Josh Bowers 

Almost no one in the legal academy has written more (or better) about guilty pleas and plea bargains than Stephanos Bibas. It is, therefore, fitting that he should author one of the first articles on Padilla v. Kentucky-a guilty-plea decision that may be the most important opinion on the topic in a generation.

 

 

 

Failing Failed States: A Response to John Yoo

03 Oct 2011 10:30am James Thuo Gathii 

In Fixing Failed States, John Yoo shows why intervening states that seek to massively transform the social, economic, and political framework of failed states aim to do too much and ultimately fail. Yoo proposes that the role of intervening states should be minimal-enforcing power-sharing agreements between competing groups within failed states, rather than seeking to massively transform them into parliamentary democracies. To give a fair reply to Yoo's well-argued essay, Part I will outline in some detail the major highlights of his argument and its rationale. In Part II, I will offer my response.

In my view, Yoo overstates the benefits of loosening the prohibition against the use of force and the rule that occupied countries be restored to full sovereignty. By proceeding primarily from a security perspective, he offers a military solution that risks exacerbating rather than resolving the problem of failed states. His argument would have been more powerful if it were backed up by persuasive evidence and case studies to support the efficacy of his proposals. Ultimately, I disagree with the means Yoo proposes to fix failed states.

 

« PREVIOUS; 10   |   11   |   12   |   13   |   14 NEXT »

META


The California Law Review is the preeminent legal publication at the UC Berkeley School of Law.
Founded in 1912, CLR publishes six times per year on a variety of engaging topics in legal scholarship.
The law review is edited and published entirely by students at Berkeley Law.