Measuring Political Power: Suspect Class Determinations and the Poor

Measuring Political Power: Suspect Class Determinations and the Poor

Which classes are considered suspect under equal protection doctrine? The answer determines whether courts will defer to legislatures and other government actors when they single out a group for special burdens or intervene to protect that group from such treatment. Laws burdening suspect classes receive the strictest scrutiny possible and, under current doctrine, whether a class is suspect turns largely on whether the court views the group as possessing political power.

But how do courts know when a class has political power? A plurality of the Supreme Court initially suggested that political power should be measured according to a group’s descriptive representation in politics. Under that measure, the largely white, male, wealthy, and straight makeup of most of the nation’s decision-making councils would indicate that other less well-represented groups lack political power. But that measure never received majority support from the Court. Instead, the Court consolidated around a different measure of political powerone that focused on democratic actions favorable to a group. If laws have been enacted protecting the group from discrimination or otherwise advancing the group’s interests, the Court assumes that the group can attract lawmakers’ attention and therefore does not need judicial protection.

In the forty years since the Court introduced this measure of political power, it has not found a single class suspect. In fact, it is hard to imagine the Court finding any class to be politically powerless under this measure. Even the most politically marginalized groups (such as the poor, noncitizens, and felons) have benefited from laws favoring their interests. This leads us to question whether favorable democratic action is a reliable measure of political power. Focusing on the poor, we advance the first empirical test of the Supreme Court’s measure of political power. Our findings suggest that legislators’ support for antipoverty legislation is not motivated by the political power of the poorimplying that favorable democratic action does not always reliably indicate a group’s political power. Given these findings, we argue that the Court should rely on a more holistic, and thus more reliable, measure of political power. The measure should include favorable legislative actions but also indicators of lobbying activity, political responsiveness, voter turnout, and descriptive representation in politics.

PDF

More in this Issue

Presentation of AALS Section on Women in Legal Education Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lifetime Achievement Award

The California Law Review is delighted to honor Herma Hill Kay, path-breaking scholar, teacher, and leader, and recipient of the Association of American Law Schools’ Section on Women in Legal Education Lifetime Achievement Award. Professor Kay’s commitment to Berkeley, the legal academy, and the cause of women’s social progress continues to this day. This festschrift […]

Access to Justice: Reducing the Implicit Pushback Burden on Working-Class Pro Se Plaintiffs in Employment Law Cases

This Note applies social identity threat literature to the legal context in order to improve access to justice. Social identity threat literature indicates that stereotypes, associations, and similar methods center environments on particular identities. Social identity threat occurs when an individual who does not have the centered identity enters the environment, implicitly perceives marginalization, and […]

Statelessness and Child Marriage as Intersectional Phenomena: Instability, Inequality, and the Role of the International Community

In 2013, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a stand-alone resolution tackling the international problem of child marriage for the first time. Such a historic gesture by the international community was a welcome step, but not necessarily a surprise. Efforts to promote women’s empowerment have rapidly gained traction on the international stage in recent years, […]

Rules, Standards, Sentencing, and the Nature of Law

Sentencing law and practice in the United States can be characterized as an argument about rules and standards. Whereas in the decades prior to the 1980s when sentencing was largely a discretionary activity governed only by broad sentencing standards, a sentencing reform movement in the 1980s transformed sentencing practice through the advent of sentencing guidelines […]

Copwatching

This Article explores the phenomenon of organized copwatching—groups of local residents who wear uniforms, carry visible recording devices, patrol neighborhoods, and film police- citizen interactions in an effort to hold police departments accountable to the populations they police. The Article argues that the practice of copwatching illustrates both the promise of adversarialism as a form […]

Copyright and Good Faith Purchasers

Good faith purchasers for value—individuals who unknowingly and in good faith purchase property from a seller whose own actions in obtaining the property are of questionable legality—have long obtained special protection under the common law. Despite the seller’s own actions being tainted, these purchasers obtain valid title and are free to transfer the property without […]