In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror

In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror


Emergency-room personnel are acutely aware of the serious risks posed by excessive delay. Understanding the need for immediate and unhesitating action, they nevertheless routinely consume precious time to follow protocols drilled into them and practiced in advance. Why do they do this? They do it, quite obviously, to minimize the risk of making fatal but avoidable mistakes due to the psychologically flustering pressures of the moment. The aim in this piece is to tease out some of the implications of this everyday emergency-room experience””implications, in particular, for designing a more effective response to what President Bush labeled “a national emergency.”

PDF

More in this Issue

Respect and Resistance in Punishment Theory

Is it coherent to speak of a right to resist justified punishment? Thomas Hobbes thought so. This essay seeks first to (re)introduce Hobbes as a punishment theorist, and second to use Hobbes to examine what it means to respect the criminal even as we punish him. Hobbes is almost entirely neglected by scholars of criminal […]

Enforcing Nonenforcement: Countering the Threat Posed to Sanctuary Laws by the Inclusion of Immigration Records in the National Crime Information Center Database

The largest federally-maintained database of criminal information, known as the National Crime Enforcement Center (“NCIC”) increasingly includes records related to criminal and civil immigration violations. This article address the unrecognized harms of the NCIC’s inclusion of immigration records and demonstrates that the NCIC effectively compels local enforcement of federal immigration laws in contravention of locally […]

Experimentation on Prisoners: Persistent Dilemmas in Rights and Regulations

In 2006, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released Ethical Considerations for Research Involving Prisoners. This federal report recommends long-overdue changes to the federal regulations that limit human subjects research on prisoners. First, the Report recommends more systematic and rigorous review of all experimentation involving prisoners and other persons supervised under any form of state or […]

Citizenship, Organizational Citizenship, and the Laws of Overlapping Obligations

The article reveals a deep ambivalence in the law about the role of individual dissent within public and private settings and offers a way to reconcile the conflicting demands of organizational loyalty and legal compliance. It describes the vast inconsistencies that currently exist in the laws of private sector wrongful discharge, public employee First Amendment […]

Warrantless Wiretapping, FISA Reform, and the Lessons of Public Liberty: A Comment on Holmes’s Jorde Lecture

The Jorde Lecture by Holmes burns with the light of clear analysis and calm rationality. In this Essay, I wish to build on it through consideration of its model of “public liberty.” In particular, I discuss how private liberty, and in particular, information privacy, has an important role, indeed is a precondition, for public liberty. […]

Philosophy and the Politics of Unreason

Stephen Holmes has presented a lecture full of good ideas and genuine common sense. If I were in a position to hire him as Deputy Secretary of State for Policy and Planning, I would. Over the past few years, he has produced a number of pieces that identify the errors and dangers in arguments made […]

The Perilous Dialogue

The security or freedom framework fails to capture the single most important characteristic of counterterrorist law: increased executive power that shifts the balance of power between the branches of government. At each point where the legislature would be expected to push back””at the introduction of the measures, at the renewal of temporary provisions, and in […]