The web edition of the California Law Review.

CLR Online

The Supreme Court and the 117th Congress

If the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s successor is confirmed before the 2020 presidential election or in the post-election lame-duck period, and if Democrats come to have unified control of government on January 20, 2021, how can they respond legislatively to the Court’s new 6-3 conservative ideological balance? This Essay frames a hypothetical 117th Congress’s options, discusses its…

Read More
Online Article, October 2020, Monica Ramsy California Law Review Online Article, October 2020, Monica Ramsy California Law Review

Heroizing Restorative Justice: Rewriting Justice Narratives Through Superhero Cartoons

Steven Universe, a children’s cartoon that follows the lives and adventures of the half-human, half-alien boy Steven Universe and his family of intergalactic space aliens, “the Crystal Gems,” upends these narratives, instead modeling restorative justice principles—empathetic, dialogue-based communication, non-punitive conflict resolution, and communal healing—for children…

Read More

The Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty of a Minoritarian Judiciary

Popular selection of judges offers a partial answer to the charge that the judiciary has usurped the role of the People in constitutional governance. Particularly in today’s intensely polarized environment, whether judges are selected through a process that actually reflects popular preferences is thus of critical importance to the democratic legitimacy of the constitutional order…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Jessica Williams California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Jessica Williams California Law Review

The Case for Affirmative Action

Proposition 16 would undo Proposition 209. Its passage would not create racial quota systems, which the Supreme Court, in University of California v. Bakke, deemed unconstitutional, but would make it possible for state offices to consider applicants’ identities when making decisions about where resources are allocated and access is granted…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Laurel E. Fletcher, David Maxson Harris California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Laurel E. Fletcher, David Maxson Harris California Law Review

The Case for U.S. Social Justice Movements to Go International

Social justice movements must abandon their longstanding reliance on the Supreme Court to stave off the worst threats to the rights of members of marginalized and vulnerable groups. The fight for rights in the United States may well start to more closely resemble, for perhaps the first time since the civil rights movement, that in many places abroad…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Bryce Rosenbower California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Bryce Rosenbower California Law Review

The Single Transferable Vote and Proportional Representation in the People’s House

To achieve adequate representation, House elections should strive to achieve as few distortions of the popular will as possible, while maintaining identifiable, local representation. Most U.S. elections are first-past-the-post, also known as single-member district plurality systems (SMDP). SMDP produces identifiable local representatives but fails to accurately reflect voter sentiment. Instead, House elections should implement a single-transferable vote system (STV) within multimember districts…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Nicholas Almendares California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Nicholas Almendares California Law Review

Unmarked Agents, Accountability, and the Anti-Commandeering Doctrine

No state agents have been impressed into service. But the anti-commandeering doctrine is based on a theory of political accountability, which is undermined by these unmarked federal agents. Thus, while there is no formal commandeering happening, the federal government’s use of unmarked agents creates exactly the kind of confusion in the lines of political accountability that the anti-commandeering doctrine is designed to prevent…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Christopher Gao California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Christopher Gao California Law Review

Social Media Censorship, Free Speech, and the Super Apps

The controversies over social media center on some fundamental ideas—namely, free speech and its societal value. Historians debate why the Framers chose to add the protection of free speech to the First Amendment. But depending on one’s legal philosophy, the Framers’ intentions should not be the only issue on this matter. Like with most normative questions, the value of free speech splits into two camps of thought: the utilitarian and the deontology…

Read More
Blog, October 2020, Yunpeng (Patrick) Xiong California Law Review Blog, October 2020, Yunpeng (Patrick) Xiong California Law Review

The COVID-19 Pandemic Witnessed the Weakened Authority of the WHO

When it comes to global health, the World Health Organization (WHO) is the most widely acknowledged international authority and the major coordinator of international efforts to contain communicable diseases. However, the organization is now under close scrutiny as the media and governments of some Member States have accused the WHO of responding to the unprecedented crisis in a disappointing way…

Read More